Evaluation of my thriller production opening
• In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
I believe that my media project develops and uses forms and conventions in the film. I used many codes and conventions during my production to create an authentic thriller feeling. Firstly, two thriller characters are used create to tension. They are two rather lonely and violent characters. One of the characters, played by Ian Gurney, is a typical thug who intendeds on getting revenge on the other man, Played by me (Ryan Hayward). We decided to dress the thug in dark clothes such as the black leather coat and DM boots. This gives a sense of intimidation and the dark life of the thug. The other character dresses in normal clothes to create a sense of normality about him. However, this is far from the truth. He lives in the run down house with very little possessions in the middle of nowhere. We decided to use the derelict house because this further added to the spooky and dark natural of both characters. This, along with the train station next to it, gave a perfect opportunity to create the sense we were wanted to achieving. We decided to film the production at dusk. This gave the camera enough light but also provided an eerie touch to the production. These conditions also proved useful when the headlights of the train became towards the camera.
The soundtrack that I have used for my thriller production helps to increase the tension. This wasn’t the first choice of music after finding out that could I couldn’t use copyrighted material. The music that I used rises and fails throughout the opening. I have edited the soundtrack to rise at certain points in the production to increase the suspense.
I believe in that my production didn’t challenge the convention of a normal thriller film. Most of the techniques I used have been repeated in many block-buster thriller films such as Identity and Heat.
• How does your media product represent particular social groups?
In my production, I only had two characters, both which are male. This creates the stereotypical image of the villain and murderer being male. The victim in the production, played by Ryan Hayward, is a lonely guy, who lives in a run-down house next to a rural station. I used this location as it is a stereotypical thriller location. The station is in a rural and sleepy village with small population. This is a stereotypical location due to it being quiet, helping to cover up the murder. Before the victims life in the run down house, he had attacked a friend of the murderer. In my production, the victim is represented as doing nothing wrong, however as said before, there is more than meets the eye.
The villain is the production is the stereotypical hard-man. He wears a leather jacket and big black boots. He is in no mood to chat and is ruthless is the killing of the victim. In the production, he is represented as a ruthless and no-nonsense killer. I show this in the production by the first shots of him. The first of him is when he steps off the train and him walking down the platform. These shots were used as they covered up his identity but also showed his ‘hard’ character with the knife shot, his purposeful walk and the style of his clothes.
• What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
I believe that my thriller production would be distributed by an art house such as Cinema City in Norwich. I think that is would suit my production because the storyline and the style of the thriller is like a smaller production film. After asking the media class and teacher, they also agreed that this thriller should be screened in a small cinema due to the plot and the way that it was been produced. Both the rural setting and the ambiguity of the characters would suit an art house audience.
I believe that this shouldn’t go to a multiplex cinema due to this film not small production and style. The storyline would be too far off the normal storyline and complicated for a multiplex audience. Also, with this being a United Kingdom production, there is a less chance of it making it in the US backed and run multiplex cinemas. Furthermore, they would prefer to screen an audience favourite from the USA as this would be more likely to produce a larger income than a small-production from the UK
• Who would be the audience for your media product?
I plan to aim the opening predominantly at a male audience: by the way in which we aim it in the sun-genre of Crime/Thriller with references to corruption and organised crime. However, because of the subtly of the action, shots and by the way it is filmed, this will hopefully help it to appeal to a female target audience as well. By doing this, we are opening it up to as wider audience as possible. Television shows such as Waking the Dead and Above Suspicion. The deal with the cases of murder and crime that usually take twists and turns before finding the real offender. Also, I think that the target audience would like films such as Psycho and Leon as they both use similar codes and conventions to my production (Crime and murder).
I aim to base my media production opening on the age group 16-30 because both characters are in this age bracket. Also, as one of the characters carries a weapon with the potential kill; this would not the suitable for a lower age group. Although I would like it to appeal to all age groups, this is not possible due to the content in the production. Furthermore, when researching about thriller films in previous tasks, I found out that the 16-30 demographic group enjoyed thriller genre films.
• How did you attract/address your audience?
After looking through the results from the questionnaires that we handed out, I can tell that most people liked the concept and final production of Deception. Two people gave the five categories (Genre, Narrative and characters, Sound, Mise-en-scene, Camera Work and Production, Editing and post-production, Media studies project) all above 8 with one 10 coming from Amy Collins for the Camera Work and Production. 6 people in the survey gave the 5 categories a score between 6 and 10, with Emily Buck giving the production three 9’s for Genre, Camera Work and Production and Editing and post-production and a perfect score of 10 for did it work as a media studies project. Finally, 1 person gave the film a score between 5 and 8 for the five categories.
After looking through the questionnaires, the participants in my focus group all liked the narrative and characters, with 1 participant giving it 6, 4 people giving this category 7 out of 10 and another 4 people giving it a rating of 8. This shows that the focus group enjoyed the storyline and would want to watch the full length film. I think they would have liked the interesting character storylines and the suspense that was building up though the two minutes.
• What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
Looking back at the thriller ‘task, I feel that that one main things I have learnt is that slight changes can be made in the editing process but improve the production massively. Other things that I learnt are how to use the editing program (Adobe) and the various audio and visual techniques that we discovered.
• Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full project?
I believe that I have learnt a lot of processes and techniques that are involved in creating a successful film. The preliminary task that was completed before the thriller production help to think and plan about the shooting and editing involved.
I think that my group worked very well to produce this project. We decided to split certain planning and research jobs to make it easier for us. Once we were ready to shoot, the production, we planned everything thoroughly, making sure we wrote down every shot and any equipment/props that we needed. When editing together, we made a decisions as a group, with advice from other people in the class and the teacher. We worked maturely to make sure we got the production that we were looking for and finished it with time to spare.
In the production of Deception, I worked on practical and technology mostly. In the planning stage, we all added information for the treatments, with Ian Gurney and Jeni Dady typing the final copy up. The storyboards were also drawn up by Jeni. I worked on the itinerary and shot selection for the shooting days and the soundtrack write up.
Before we started filming, I drew up all the equipment that was needed. This included booking cameras and tripods, buying a tape for the camera and making sure everyone had the equipment that they were due to bring in. Once we got to the film set, I was responsible for most of the camera filming. This only excluded any shot that I was in, in which case Jeni Dady filmed. I was also responsible for safeguarding of the camera and tripod, which belonged to the school.
Once we had all the shots that we needed, I and Ian worked on the editing, with Jeni overseeing the project. With little lessons to edit and put are production together, I worked in my spare time to finish off the project. This included finding a new soundtrack (after the first one was copyrighted), creating titles for the beginning and transferring any footage from the camera to the computer.
I think that the feedback we have received from the class has been good. Nearly all the class enjoyed the production, with the train shot being there favourite shot in the film. I think that the teacher’s comments were helpful in creating a more polished finish. However, I think, at times she was a bit negative in pointing out shots that could have been better. Apart from that, no one gave us any bad comments over the production.
I think that the strength of the production is the variety of shots used and the setting that we used. I believe that the setting with the station and the derelict house was the best part of the film. Without this setting, the film wouldn’t have looked as professional and spooky. However, if I was going to produce this film again, I would change a few things. Firstly, I would have prepared and planned the shooting day better. We decided to film in the darker lighting once we got to the location, which gave us little time to film. Because of this, we had to shoot for a second time. Also, some of the shots were either to shaky or something came into the shot that wasn’t supposed to. In the shot of the train coming towards the camera, a little part of my black coat appears in the top right hand corner of the shot for 2 seconds. Small mistakes like this made the production look slightly amateur, which isn’t what I w3as looking for.
The most important thing that I have learned from the making of Deception is that planning is key to a successful film. If you don’t plan every shot that is in the film, something will either go wrong or not to your liking. Planning the day of shooting is also key, so you do not forget any shots or equipment that was necessary.